Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters

On 10/03/2007 12:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
>>
> 
> Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical.  It should be followed up
> with a lot of manual merging.
> 

It would be really nice if identical kernel parameters used the same names,
so people didn't waste their time trying e.g. "nolapic_timer" on x86_64
because that option fixed their problems on i386 (it's "noapictimer" in
x86_64.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] Blackfin fixing for 2.6.23-rc9
• Next by Date: Re: [bug] crash when reading /proc/mounts (was: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]