Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Just make the __pid_nr() etc functions that expect the argument
> to always be not NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>

>  static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *pid)
>  {
>  	pid_t nr = 0;
>  	if (pid)
> -		nr = pid->numbers[0].nr;
> +		nr = __pid_nr(pid);
>  	return nr;
>  }

Is there a patch that removes these inlines? Otherwise this looks good
to me.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids
    • From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] Make tasks always have non-zero pids
    • From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids
    • From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Question] How to represent SYSTEM_RAM in kerenel/resouce.c
• Next by Date: Re: Point of gpl-only modules (flame)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]