Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection

Nick wrote:
> If code isn't ready to go, it doesn't need to rush, it can just be untangled
> or fixed properly etc.

True ... though we seem to be going in circles now.  I doubt
taking longer will help much; we should strive to resolve this
now, if we can.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • -mm merge plans for 2.6.24
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
• Next by Date: [bootup warning] "driver" has no release callback, .23-rc9
• Previous by thread: Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
• Next by thread: Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]