Re: [PATCH] UML - Fix locking in skb alloction failure fix

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:26:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Doesn't this assume that the arch is only ever uniprocessor, which I
> don't think is true on i386 UML??

It is for now, and when that changes, I haven't decided if and when
interrupts will be received on multiple CPUs.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] UML - Fix locking in skb alloction failure fix
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] UML - Fix locking in skb alloction failure fix
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt_ops: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller pv_*_ops
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 - tcp_fastretrans_alert() WARNING
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] UML - Fix locking in skb alloction failure fix
• Next by thread: [patch] x86: improved memory barrier implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]