Re: [PATCH 2/4] dmapool: Validate parameters to dma_pool_create

From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:01:17 -0400

> Check that 'align' is a power of two, like the API specifies.
> Align 'size' to 'align' correctly -- the current code has an off-by-one.
> The ALIGN macro in kernel.h doesn't.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • dmapool
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/4] dmapool: Validate parameters to dma_pool_create
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Avoid taking waitqueue lock in dmapool
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs/ocfs2/: removed unneeded initial value and function's return value
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dmapool: Validate parameters to dma_pool_create
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/4] Change dmapool free block management
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]