In message <[email protected]>, Jan Engelhardt writes:
>
> On Sep 26 2007 11:43, Erez Zadok wrote:
> >
> >*That's* the information I was looking for, Kyle: what's the estimated
> >probability I should be using as my guideline. I used 95% (20/1 ratio), and
>
> ;-)
>
> 19:1 <=> 95:5 <=> 95% <=> ratio=0.95 != 20.0 (=20/1)
>
> >you're telling me I should use 99% (100/1 ratio). The difference between
>
> 99:1 <=> 99% <=> ratio=0.99 != 100.0 (=100/1)
>
> >the number of cycles saved/added is very compelling. Given that I certainly
> >agree with you that I'm using un/likely too much. I'll re-evaluate and
> >update my patch series then.
Yeah, close enough. :-)
The important issue is that I'm probably using about five times too many
un/likely wrappers.
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
