Re: Chroot bug

Alan Cox napsal(a):

but many program use this as security feature. So do you think that bind may use vserver?

It would be a lot stronger if it did. A bind running non-root will be
probably safe. A bind running as root can be attacked and break out of a
chroot trivially. I guess it depends how you run bind.

but not bind with selinux. It can chroot, but not does other things. So there is an question: Why we do not fix it. Tell me please some other reason than "you can workaround chroot other ways".

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: "Philipp Marek" <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: Philipp Marek <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Chroot bug (was: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix)
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug (was: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix)
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: David Newall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Chroot bug
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ahci: enable GHC.AE bit before set GHC.HR
• Previous by thread: Re: Chroot bug
• Next by thread: Re: Chroot bug
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]