Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for
the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template
members getting modified.
Goodness, Jeff, you haven't looked too hard. There's dozens of examples
I've come across trawling the horrible unmaintained drivers. I'd love
to see scsi_host_template become const, but it's not happening any time
soon, and we can address this little piece when the time comes.
Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory.
We're talking about common code.
If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
