* Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:00:36 +0200
>
> Hi Mathieu & Randy.
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:11:48AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
>>
>> Begin infrastructure for kernel code samples in the samples/ directory.
>> Add its Kconfig and Kbuild files.
>> Source its Kconfig file in all arch/ Kconfigs.
>
> Sorry for not commenting on this before...
> The samples directory contains sample code so it is wrong to actually
> include it as part of the kernel IMHO.
Count my HO too.
Kernel isn't school desk at first place. It's already bloated as with
various 2+y obsolete changelogs (that have content, that even older),
with unsorted documentation (hypertext and http are better on this).
Up to date test cases and example code must be on developer's site,
not as burden in the sources. Yea, linux tar ball is a popular one.
But sorry, it already has too much unneeded stuff for most of the
freelance users and testers. This tarball must have good end result
with propper changelogs and pointers to *fresh* information.
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
