Hi.
On Friday 21 September 2007 11:06:23 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +1000 Nigel Cunningham
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew.
> >
> > On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:09:41 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Seems like good enough for -mm to me.
> > >
> > > Pavel
> >
> > Andrew, if I recall correctly, you said a while ago that you didn't want
> > another hibernation implementation in the vanilla kernel. If you're going
to
> > consider merging this kexec code, will you also please consider merging
> > TuxOnIce?
> >
>
> The theory is that kexec-based hibernation will mainly use preexisting
> kexec code and will permit us to delete the existing hibernation
> implementation.
>
> That's different from replacing it.
TuxOnIce doesn't remove the existing implementation either. It can
transparently replace it, but you can enable/disable that at compile time.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Christian Reformed Church of Cobden
103 Curdie Street, Cobden 3266, Victoria, Australia
Ph. +61 3 5595 1185 / +61 417 100 574
Communal Worship: 11 am Sunday.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
