printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Given that
> a) there're plenty of printks without any KERN_* bloat,
> b) there're printks that SHOULD NOT have KERN_* bloat,

Just to clarify, which bloat are you concerned about?
I presume source code bloat (but maybe you mean
message size bloat, or object code bloat)?

 -- Tim

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
    • From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: failure to boot on HP nx6325, no sound when booted, USB-related WARNING
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40
• Previous by thread: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
• Next by thread: Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]