Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> i've meanwhile tested hackbench 90 and the performance difference 
> between -ck and -cfs-devel seems to be mostly down to the more precise 
> (but slower) sched_clock() introduced in v2.6.23 and to the startup 
> penalty of freshly created tasks.

Rob, another thing i just noticed in your .configs: you have 
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y enabled. Would it be possible to get a testrun with 
that disabled? That gives the best throughput and context-switch latency 
numbers. (CONFIG_PREEMPT might also have preemption artifacts - there's 
one report of it having _worse_ desktop latencies on certain hardware 
than !CONFIG_PREEMPT.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux