Re: RFC: bug in load_elf_binary?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote:

The elf spec says that PT_LOAD segments must be ordered by vaddr.  We
want to have a segment at a relatively low fixed vaddr.  The exact
address is not important, except that it's lower than the standard elf
headers and so it must be the first segment in the elf file.


So you want a zero mapping at a particular address?  So the vaddr and
the memsz are set, but offset and filesz are zero?

I believe that's correct. It's basically the equivalent of BSS, but used for an emulated OS (the app in question is an emulator).

Well, you could make the p_offset the same as the first segment with a
non-zero filesz.  That should satisfy the elf loader, though it might
still confuse things.

Interesting idea.  Worth a try.

However, this doesn't address the kernel side of things. Am I correct in thinking that the kernel is making an invalid assumption that it can find the load_addr based on the first segment?

Why can't you create this mapping at runtime?

Our emulated OS wants to put stuff at fixed addresses in this range, so we're trying to keep the loader from allocating stuff there before our program gets a chance to start up.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux