On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:37:37 PDT, Randy Dunlap said: > Thanks. I look forward to the explanation of Reviewed-by, what it > means, and how it differs from Acked-by. As long as you're at it, the only tag *I* seem to need is 'Tested-By:' :)
Attachment:
pgpWnUue3caQT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- References:
- [patch 0/6] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/6] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/3] core: Provide an arch independent means of accessing cpu_sibling_map
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
- Index(es):