Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I agree.  The patch is a nop.  I just got overly paranoid.  The whole
>> thing is just very prone to bugs.
>>     
> So do we need a patch for .23 or not?
>   

Forgot this bit.  No, I think the upshot is that it isn't necessary (nor
Rusty's).

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
• Next by Date: Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug
• Next by thread: [BUG] problem with nfs_invaildate_page
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]