* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Essentially I observed that nice 0 tasks still endup on two cores of same
> > package, with out getting spread out to two different packages. This behavior
> > is same with out this fix and this fix doesn't help in any way.
>
> Ingo, Appended patch seems to fix the issue and as far as I can test,
> seems ok to me.
thanks! I've queued your fix up for .23 merge. I've done a quick test
and it indeed seems to work well.
> This is a quick fix for .23. Peter Williams and myself plan to look at
> code cleanups in this area (HT/MC optimizations) post .23
>
> BTW, with this fix, do you want to retain the current FUZZ value?
what value would you suggest? I was thinking about using
busiest_rq->curr->load.weight instead, to always keep rotating tasks.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
