On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:40:59PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> > There's no reason not to just mount server:/exports/data directly at
> > /home/data; the bind mounts are just a workaround for the somewhat
> > primitive exports facility on the server side.
>
> Bullshit. Bindings are first-class operations on _client_, regardless
> of fs types involved.
I know. Did I say something to the contrary?
Maybe I was too terse; in more detail: the original poster appears to be
mounting server:/exports/data by first mounting server:/ somewhere and
then bind-mounting the exports/data someplace else. I couldn't see an
obvious reason they'd be using two steps instead of just performing a
single mount of server:/exports/data.
So my assumption was that this was due to a confused memory of some
server-side setup instructions. (On the server side, nfs4 export setup
often requires the administrator to do some extra bind mounts which
shouldn't really be necessary.)
--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
