Re: [PATCH] Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > Ergo the only  
> > > people who should be writing security policy for deployment are those  
> > > people who have studied and trained in the stuff.  Those people are  
> > > also known as "security professionals".
> > 
> > If only security professionals can use the system you have failed
> > to provide a general purpose facility. It may have value in limited
> > circumstances but it is not for everybody.
> 
> But that's okay. Maybe SElinux is not simple enough to use for
> everyone, but that does not mean you can't auto-generate policy from
> something else, "easy to understand". IOW smack may be great idea,

Thank you.

> but you written it in wrong language. You
> written it in C, while you should have written it in SELinux policy
> language (and your favourite scripting language as frontend).

I have often marvelled at the notion of a simplification layer.
I believe that you build complex things on top of simple things,
not the other way around.


Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux