On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The DMA zone will be still there, but only reachable with special functions.
> >
> > Not too happy with that one but this is going the right direcrtion.
> >
> > On NUMA this would still mean allocating space for the DMA zone on all
> > nodes although we only need this on node 0.
>
> The DMA allocator is NUMA unaware. This means it doesn't require multiple
> dma zones per node, but is happy with a global one that can live somewhere
> else outside the pgdat. I also removed PCP and other fanciness so it's
> really quite independent and much simpler than the normal one. It also
> doesn't need try_to_free_pages() because in a isolated zone there
> shouldn't be any freeable pages.
You said that ZONE_DMA will still be there right? So the zone will be
replicated over all nodes but remain unused except for node 0.
> There are still other architectures that use it. Biggest offender
> is s390. I'll leave them to their respective maintainers.
IA64 also uses ZONE_DMA to support 32bit controllers.
So I think we can only get rid of ZONE_DMA in its 16MB incarnation for
i386 and x86_64.
But you will be keeping ZONE_DMA32?
If so then it may be better to drop ZONE_DMA32 and make ZONE_DMA be below
4GB like other 64bit arches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
