Re: [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 19:06 +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> NAK: Strange patch title "[133/2many] ...."

I didn't expect these patches to be accepted as is actually.

There isn't _that_ much difference between sending a 200KB
patch file and what I sent.  Nail could use the ability to
add a threading header though.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER
    • From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RESEND][Trivial] Documentation: sysrq, description of 'h' slightly inaccurate
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [133/2many] MAINTAINERS - CONEXANT ACCESSRUNNER USB DRIVER
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]