Re: [PATCH] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
From: James Smart <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:32:08 -0400
Cc: [email protected], Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)

ACK

-- james s

Jesper Juhl wrote:

I propose this patch, that simply changes the 'hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS'into 'hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS' as a possible fix.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
---

 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
Next by thread: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux