Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64

> Hm.  So x86-64 doesn't make 64-bit pointers be 64-bit aligned?

The ABI does of course, although the penalty of not doing it on current
CPUs is only minor.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 23/25] [PATCH] paravirt hooks for arch initialization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]