Re: [PATCH] Check patch reports multiple var with a function assignment

Jason Wessel wrote:
> Running checkpatch.pl products an warning when it should not.  I believe
> it can be fixed by adding to the regular expression, but feel free to
> fix it another way as I may not know all the cases this is trying to catch.

Thanks for the patch.  We had already caught this one and the test
itself now is likely to be shelved, a new release with this update in is
iminent.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Check patch reports multiple var with a function assignment
    • From: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH 4/9] Memory controller memory accounting (v4)
• Next by Date: Re: BIOS implementors disabling the LAPIC
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Check patch reports multiple var with a function assignment
• Next by thread: inotify and /proc/<pid>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]