Ok, I took this, and modified Len's patch to re-introduce ACPI_SLEEP on
top of it (I took the easy way out, and just made PM_SLEEP imply
ACPI_SLEEP, which should make everything come out right. I could have
dropped ACPI_SLEEP entirely in favour of PM_SLEEP, but that would have
implied changing more of Len's patch than I was really comfy with).
Len, Rafael, please do check that the end result looks ok.
I suspect ACPI could now take the PM_SLEEP/SUSPEND/HIBERNATE details into
account, and that some of the code is not necessary when HIBERNATE is not
selected, for example, but I'm not at all sure that it's worth it being
very fine-grained.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
