Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:47:37AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Yes, that's the price to pay if you want to select something that in >> turn depends on a number of other things. > > Yes, but a good user interface is worth it. That's right. But a hypothetical other way would be to leave Kconfigs minimal ands put the necessary features into scripts/kconfig. -- Stefan -ENOPATCH Richter -=====-=-=== -=== ===-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
- CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected -- (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [<c03d95d3>] irias_seq_show+0xba/0x1a8
- Next by Date: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- Index(es):
 |