Andrew,
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:32:29 +0200 Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> The timerfd() syscall went into 2.6.22. While writing the man page for
>> this syscall I've found some notable limitations of the interface, and I am
>> wondering whether you and Linus would consider having this interface fixed
>> for 2.6.23.
>>
>> On the one hand, these fixes would be an ABI change, which is of course
>> bad. (However, as noted below, you have already accepted one of the ABI
>> changes that I suggested into -mm, after Davide submitted a patch.)
>>
>> On the other hand, the interface has not yet made its way into a glibc
>> release, and the change will not break applications. (The 2.6.22 version
>> of the interface would just be "broken".)
>
> I think if the need is sufficient we can do this: fix it in 2.6.23 and in
> 2.6.22.x. That means that there will be a few broken-on-new-glibc kernels
> out in the wild, but very few I suspect.
So I'm still not quite clear. Can I take it from your statement above that
the proposed ABI changes would be admissible, as long as Davide is okay
with them?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
