Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2

On 7/23/2007 10:23 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> this one already in -mm, but it needs [PATCH 1/10]
> 
> [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
[...]
> this patch is using second method.
[...]

Could you shorten the patch description?

Don't describe what your patch _does not_ do.  Don't even describe _how_
your patch does what it does (unless it's obfuscated, but then that
would be a bad patch anyway).

Just describe _why_ it does something.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
    • From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-git17 boot failure
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]