Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:33:46 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> If mmc_start_request() is considered part of an API people should
> use, why isn't there a prototype in a header file?
> 

Just goes to show how much I know. ;)

So I guess we can privatize that one. But I'd still like to keep
mmc_wait_for_app_cmd().

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] Re: Hibernation considerations
• Next by Date: Re: build fix for x86_64...
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static
• Next by thread: [patch] x86_64: Avoid too many remote cpu references due to /proc/stat
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]