On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:49:05 +0200
Juergen Beisert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 03:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:06:27 +0200
> >
> > Juergen Beisert <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
> > > With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
> > > setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
> > > With inlined functions this line will work as expected.
> >
> > I don't get it. Why would the macros behave differently from inlined
> > functions?
>
> X86 magic. The access order is important. The first access must always be the
> offset at 0x22. This access enables the next access to 0x23 (data). If you do
> it in wrong order, it fails. With the macros you get something like 0x22,
> 0x22, 0x23, 0x23. With the inline functions 0x22,0x23,0x22,0x23.
>
> Juergen
Wow, that's a really cool bug; nice work! Don't forget to update
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/state.c, though; it uses setCx86() as well. It needs
to include processor-cyrix.h.
Acked-by: Andres Salomon <[email protected]>
--
Andres Salomon <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
