Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

* Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:

> > +	if ((print_timestamp >= touch_timestamp &&
> > +			print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1)) ||
> > +			did_panic || !per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu)) {
> >  		return;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* do not print during early bootup: */
> >  	if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)) {
> 
> patch contains unneeded braces { }.

for multi-line conditions like the above they can be used.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] softlockup watchdog: fix Xen bogosity
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] softlockup watchdog: fix Xen bogosity
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Containers: css_put() dilemma
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]