From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
> If we don't know what caused a problem in the first place, or if the fix
> is known to be required for something else and reverting it would cause
> *another* regression, it would be another issue. But as it is, reverting
> it would seem to unquestionably get rid of a regression, and is thus a
> no-brainer.
>
> No?
Sure, but I thought it would be nice to give Olaf a day or two to
figure out what's going on rather than have the knee-jerk reaction to
just revert.
Ingo is the only person hitting and reporting this and last time I
checked he is competent enough to revert the thing locally in his own
trees, right? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
