Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)

* Remy Bohmer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Arjan,
> 
> Thanks for this suggestion.

(please dont top-post, ever. See:
 www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/top-posting.txt)

> But I looked at Systemtap before, and as I remember, it is very 
> flexible, but it only traces function calls. (or am I missing 
> something?)

systemtap it should be able to trace variables as well. (as long as 
those variables are not eliminated by gcc)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
    • From: "Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
    • From: "Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/10] IB/ehca: Support large page MRs
• Previous by thread: Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
• Next by thread: Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]