Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 16 July 2007 22:14:41 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > On 7/16/07, Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > >> Or just "cp -al" to create multiple trees at (almost) no disk cost
> > >> that won't interfere with each other in any way, and makes the
> > >> development process / generating patchsets trifle easier as well ...
> > >
> > >That would be correct if hardlinks would actually do a CoW on modify,
> > >instead
> > >of misleading the user into thinking he is modifying an independent
> > > file.
> >
> > "patch" already handles this correctly ... and
> > backupcopy=auto,breakhardlink in vim (and something similar in other
> > editors I presume)
>
> Yet even a single program failing to break the link will leave you with
> a mess to sort out.
No kidding!
> The only place that can ensure to always break the
> link is the kernel. Which is why I wrote the cowlink patches some years
> back.
Can you post a patch against 2.6.22?
> The still need a lot of love to be merge-ready. But I do use them on a
> daily basis.
Well, if the patch is lean and optional and runtime configurable, then they
should definitely be considered for inclusion.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
