Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> because when i assumed the obvious, you called it an
> insult so please dont leave any room for assumptions and remove any
> ambiguity - especially as our communication seems to be marred by what
> appears to be frequent misunderstandings ;-)
What the hell is this supposed to be? How am I not to take this:
"i did not want to embarrass you (and distract the discussion) with
answering a pretty stupid, irrelevant question"
as an insult? How does it reflect on someone if he asks "stupid,
irrelevant questions"? If it had been a misunderstanding, you could have
ask appropriately instead of assuming I'm an idiot.
BTW Adding smileys to it doesn't make it any funnier, since it I don't
believe in the "misunderstandings" theory anymore. :-(
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
