how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  as time goes by, the informational value of the feature removal file
is rapidly approaching zero, as alleged deadlines for removal are
continually dismissed, while some removal dates as far back as 2005
are still in that file.

  if those features aren't going to be removed, then will someone at
least recalibrate their removal dates and update that file?

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux