Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19

On Monday 16 July 2007 05:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I run a java application at nice 15.  Its been a background 
> > application here for as long as SD and CFS have been around.  If I 
> > have a compile running at nice 0, with v19 java gets so little cpu 
> > that the the wrapper that runs to monitor it is timing out waiting for 
> > it to start.  This is new in v19 - something in v19 is not meshing 
> > well with my mix of applications...
> 
> how much longer did the startup of the java app get relative to say v18?
> 
> to debug this, could you check whether this problem goes away if you use 
> nice 10 (or nice 5) instead of nice 15?

Ingo,

It may take a day to two before I get to test this. I have had to revert to 2.6.21 -
it seems that 22 triggers a stall here (21 also can trigger this but its harder)...

Thanks
Ed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_connlimit needs to depend on nf_conntrack
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] splice: fix wrong __splice_from_pipe() usage
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]