Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default

Stefan Richter wrote:

Yinghai Lu wrote:

original default is -1, and this patch just try to use parent's node as
default.

But in many cases, the patch does so at a time when the parent is not
yet known.

then it will use -1.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SCHED: Generic hooks for trapping task preemption
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 24/61] sysfs: make sysfs_put() ignore NULL sd
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]