Re: [stable] generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

* Thomas Gleixner ([email protected]) wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > They all look pretty innocuous to me.
> > 
> > Could you please take a second look, decide if any of them should also be
> > in 2.6.22.x and let me know?
> 
> i386-hpet-check-if-the-counter-works.patch
> pcspkr-use-the-global-pit-lock.patch
> 
> are the only candidates.

yup, come through -stable a few times, be great to get them upstream,
and into .22.y

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 19/23] elevate write count for do_utimes()
• Next by Date: [PATCH 17/23] nfs: check mnt instead of superblock directly
• Previous by thread: Re: generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
• Next by thread: Re: generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]