Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> Too bad, not just for x86-newsetup but lots of other gits as well.
> 

Well, it's a function of gitweb, but we have been forced to disable it
because it interferes hideously with the caching system.  We'll
hopefully eventually get around to fixing it, but it's not a high
priority unfortunately.

So far our effort at getting paid staff seems to have fallen through :(

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: "Chris Smith" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] manpage for fallocate
• Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch fixes (try #2)
• Previous by thread: Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
• Next by thread: Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]