Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

> > You're missing the point. I'm arguing that a sync from within the freezer 
> > should guarantee that there is no data loss.
> 
> Well, it should, but it doesn't ...
> 
> Moreover, if FUSE implements syncing, then the sync from within the freezer
> will almost certainly deadlock.

Rafael, think positively: by the time fuse implements sync(), the
freezer will be long gone ;)

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] lib/ioremap.c should #include <linux/io.h>
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]