On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:40:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > yeah, i use gnome-terminal exclusively. But testers looking for CFS > regressions do run every shell on the planet :-) ...and people running older kernels get different results (no surprise) fwiw, I ran 'top' on 5 terminals with xterm-spam running concurrently on 2.6.15 (rxvt, pterm, xterm, konsole and gnome-terminal). For that case, gnome-terminal was definitely the slowest, and used the most CPU time (more than a factor of three slower than xterm). konsole was about 2.5, pterm was about the same as xterm, and rxvt about half the CPU (ymmv). > > gnome-terminal is also faster all around (at least on my box): -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Attachment:
pgpuqkoUhafXw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
- Index(es):
 |