Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 10:48 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> btw., small patch format comment: it would be useful (in the future) to 
> send such combined patches as:
> 
>  [patch 0/2] general description
>  [patch 1/2] first patch
>  [patch 2/2] second patch

Sure, no problem. I usually do that automatically due to quilt but this
was just 2 out of 52 patches I have pending right now so... :) And akpm
says that 0/2 should only contain stuff not meant for the changelog.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
• Next by Date: Re: x86_64 memory hotplug simulation support?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]