> Looks fairly reasonable to me. However, I suspect any use of _GTM is
> somewhat dangerous (at least after the resume) unless we use the _STM
> and _GTF methods in the proper sequence when resuming. (Is that in the
> -mm tree now?)
Yes - and we only use it in these drivers to check for cable evidence not
for anything more serious.
> speed we give it is valid, since there is no sane way for the function
> to indicate failure. (Thus the problem with the "cram in all possible
> values to see what it supports" strategy for determining mode limits..)
The spec I have says it'll hand back the mode it actually uses which is
effectively a solution for 'failure'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
