Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> I'd agree that there's a need for a state where we power down as much as 
> possible (even at the cost of functionality), but where possible it 
> would also be nice to offer a state where the mac is powered down and 
> the phy left up.

There are PHYs which can detect that someone's on the other end even
when powered down..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down
    • From: "Török Edvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64
• Next by Date: Re: [RFD 1/4] Pass no useless nameidata to the create, lookup, and permission IOPs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down
• Next by thread: PM policy, hotplug, power saving (was Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]