Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:22:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > Right, however many patches don't map to bug reports and don't 
> > need the heavy use of BTS. This suggestion is mainly for the 
> > improvement of peer review concerning code changes submitted 
> > by people who are not the maintainers.
> 
> Unfortunately you didn't listen, OK, just two messages:
> 
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/544898>
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/545112>
> 
> As you will see, nobody cares about comprehensive
> patches/tests/bugs/testers/developers *tracking* system.
> 
> And don't limit yourself to fast conclusions. Thanks.

I am not proposing a comprehensive tracking system. I think
you are taking my intentions quite off-course.

-- 
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux