On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:08:54AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:01:44AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > * Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:34:51 +0300
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to present a suggestion for automatic generation of
> > > carbon copy fields in the E-Mails of posted patches.
> > >
> > > Basically, instead of manually figuring out who to add to CC
> > > when sending a patch to LKML by looking at MAINTAINERS, a
> > > script can look at '.maintainers' files spread across the
> > > source tree and automatically generate a proper list of CCs
> > > for a patch.
> > LKML archive near you, search phrase "BTS", subjects that have
> > something about "the quality of the kernel". Good luck.
> Right, however many patches don't map to bug reports and don't
> need the heavy use of BTS. This suggestion is mainly for the
> improvement of peer review concerning code changes submitted
> by people who are not the maintainers.
Unfortunately you didn't listen, OK, just two messages:
As you will see, nobody cares about comprehensive
patches/tests/bugs/testers/developers *tracking* system.
And don't limit yourself to fast conclusions. Thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]