On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:53:22PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>
> Let's start with *JUST* a driver, not trying to update everything
> else in the USB Gadget stack so that it looks like it's designed
> specifically to handle all of Intel's design botches related to
> endpoint config ... and work worse for essentially everything else.
>
> (Unlike pretty much every other vendor, Intel wanted hardware config
> management. It was unusably buggy in pxa21x/25x/26x, and not much
> better in pxa27x.)
>
>
> So in technical terms, and to repeat what I've said before: just
> configure it to act more like a PXA 25x chip (no altsettings) and
> get it so it passes all the tests [1], modulo errata which have no
> workarounds ... then submit that. No epautoconfig updates, no
> patches to every gadget driver to cope with updated autoconfig.
This looks interesting... as you alredy told this driver derives from
an older one, I just maintained it till now.
If I well understand I should remove usb_ep_autoconfig() and program
into the controller only one (the default) configuration. Is that
right?
Currently I tested the driver only with ether gadget, but if I do as
above, should I get the driver working with all gadgets automagically?
:)
Thanks a lot,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [email protected]
Linux Device Driver [email protected]
Embedded Systems [email protected]
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
