Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

Jesse Barnes wrote:

Yeah, you're right I should use an unsigned format string. Pim, if you change it to %lu does the printk in your dmesg look better?

Er, no.

**** MTRRs don't cover all of memory, trimmed 18446744073709486080 pages

Thanks,
Pim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Pim Zandbergen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: "Mauro Giachero" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/3] MAP_NOZERO - implement sys_brk2()
• Next by Date: Re: Linux Kernel include files
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]