Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 19:06 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:57:07AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Your syscalls blindly dereference userspace pointers instead of using
copy_{to,from} user.
I use access_ok() to test userspace addresses. It should be ok,
shouldn't it?

No; it's racy. You must use copy_from_user() and copy_to_user().

Not only is it racy, but it doesn't even do all of the checks that copy_to/from_user does. access_ok only validates that the region given is potentially valid, not that it actually is. Using access_ok only allows you to use __copy_to/from_user instead, which skips the same checks that access_ok does - not worth it unless you do repeated copies to/from the same region of memory.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux