Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:31:57 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >>(and I think it mostly already doesn't even without that)
> > >
> > >It uses /sys/bus/pci/* which is not any better as seen from the
> > > IOMMU.
> > >
> > >Any interface will need to be explicit because user space needs to
> > > know which
> > >DMA addresses to put into the hardware. It's not enough to just
> > >transparently
> > >translate the mappings.
> >
> > that's what DRM is used for nowadays...
>
> But DRM does support much less hardware than the X server?

Yeah, the number of DRM drivers is relatively small compared to X or 
fbdev, but for simple DMA they're fairly easy to write.

> Perhaps we just need an ioctl where an X server can switch this.

Switch what?  Turn on or off transparent translation?

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux